Pelaksanaan PTK Secara Online: Apakah bisa?
Keywords:
Penelitian Tindakan Kelas, Online, Perilaku SiswaAbstract
Tujuan penulisan artikel ini adalah untuk meningkatkan kemampuan guru dalam memahami pelaksanaan penelitian tindakan kelas (PTK) secara online, setelah mereka diberikan pelatihan penyusunan laporan hasil PTK sebagai karya publikasi ilmiah untuk memperoleh angka kredit maksimal. Tulisan ini menggunakan studi literatur dan analisis bahan kajian yang relevan. Hasil telaahan menunjukan bahwa pada dasarnya dapat juga dilaksanakan melalui online. Disarankan agar Sekolah dapat menganalisis perilaku siswa dalam pengaturan online: misalnya; lihat kapan mereka masuk, seberapa sering mereka masuk, halaman apa yang paling sering mereka lihat, sifat komentar mereka, tingkat partisipasi dalam aktivitas online, diskusi forum dan ruang obrolan online. Evaluasi siswa terhadap kegiatan belajar adalah umpan balik penting lainnya yang dapat dikirimkan secara online atau dengan formulir survei melalui pos.
References
Anderson, P. (2007) What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education. JISC Technology & Standards Watch: available at http://www.jisc.org.uk/media/documents/techwatch/tsw0701b.pdf
Burns, M. (2002). From black and white to color: Technology professional development and changing practice. THE Journal, 29(11), 36-42.
Caruso, J.B. & Kvavik, R.B. (2005). Students and information technology, 2005: convenience, connection, control, and learning. Educause Center for Applied Research.
Chang, K. E., Sung, Y. T. & Chiou, S. K. (2002). Use of hierarchical hyper concept map in Web-based courses. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 27 (4), 333-351.
Chang, K. E., Sung, Y. T. & Lee, C. L. (2003). Web-based collaborative inquiry learning system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19 (1), 56-69.
Downes, S. (2005). E-learning 2.0, eLearn Magazine, 17 October: Accessed on May 14, 2010 from: http://www.elearnmag.org/subpage.cfm?section=articles&article=29-1
Draves, W. A. (2002). Teaching Online. Learning Resources Network, River Falls: WI.
Educational Testing Services (2013). About the SIR II: Student Instructional Report. Retrieved from http://www.ets.org/sir_ii/about.
Ekawarna dan Salam. (2020). Pelatihan PTK: Alternatif Solusi Dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Guru Menyusun Karya Tulis Ilmiah. Jurnal Karya Abdi, Volume 4 Nomor 2 Agustus 2020. pp. 195-205.
Ekawarna, 2017, Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: Referensi
Ekawarna, Salam dan Yusdi Anra. (2020). Memilih Masalah Untuk Penelitian Tindakan Kelas (Bahan kajian untuk pelatihan Guru menyusun Laporan hasil PTK), Laporan kegiatan PPM Universitas Jambi, p 3.
Escudier, M. P., Newton, T. J., Cox, M. J., Reynolds, P. A., & Odell, E. W. (2011). University students’ attainment and perceptions of computer delivered assessment; a comparison between computer-based and traditional tests in a “high-stakes” examination. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(5), 440–447. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365- 2729.2011.00409.x
Eyal, L. (2012). Digital assessment literacy: The core role of the teacher in a digital environment. Educational Technology and Society, 15(2), 37–49
Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D., & Davis, N. E. (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature. Computers and Education, 57(4), 2333–2351.
Glassmeyer, D. M., Dibbs, R. A., & Jensen, R. T. (2011). Determining utility of formative assessment through virtual community: Perspectives of online graduate students. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 12(1), 23–35.
Hanson, J. M., & Mohn, L. (2011). Assessment trends: A ten-year perspective on the uses of a general education assessment. Assessment Update: Progress, Trends, and Practices in Higher Education, 23(5), 1–15. DOI: 10.1002/au.235
Herrington, J., & Standen, P. (2000). Moving from an instructivist to a constructivist multimedia learning environment. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9(3), 195–205.
Hewson, C. (2012). Can online course-based assessment methods be fair and equitable? Relationships between students’ preferences and performance within online and offline assessments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(5), 488–498. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00473.x
Lawson, T. & Comber, C. (1999). Superhighway technology: Personnel factors leading to successful integration of information and communications technology in schools and colleges. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 8, 41-53.
Leppisaari, I., Vainio, L., Herrington, J., & Im, Y. (2011). International e-benchmarking: Flexible peer development of authentic learning principles in higher education. Educational Media International, 48(3), 179–191. DOI:10.1080/09523987.2011.607321
Lesnick, A., Cesaitis, A., Jagtiani, U., & Miller, R. (2004). Curriculum design as re-writing: Online “chat” as a resource for radicalizing the teaching of a canonical text. Curriculum & Teaching Dialogue, 6(1), 35–47.
McFarlane, A. (2003). Assessment for the digital age. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 10, 261-266.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108, 1017-1054.
National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (2010). What makes a teacher effective? Retrieved from http://www.ncate.org/public/researchreports/teacherpreparationresearch/
whatmakesateachereffective/tabid/361/default.aspx
Naughton, C., Smeed, J., & Roder, J. (2011). Delimiting the prospect of openness: An examination of the initial student approaches to e-learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(2), 103– 120.
Naughton, C., Smeed, J., & Roder, J. (2011). Delimiting the prospect of openness: An examination of the initial student approaches to e-learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(2), 103– 120.
Oosterhof, A., Conrad, R., & Ely, D. (2008). Assessing learners online. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Pacific Policy Research Center, (2010). 21st Century Skills for Students and Teachers. Honolulu: Kamehameha Schools, Research & Evaluation Division. www.ksbe.edu/spi
Perera-Diltz, D. M. (2009). Assessment purposes. In E. Bradford (Ed.), ACA encyclopedia of counseling (pp.38–39). Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.
Rogers, P. A. (2000). Barriers to adopting emerging technologies in education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 22, 455-472.
Rovai, A. P., Ponton, M. K., Derrick, M. G., & Davis, J. M. (2006). Student evaluation of teaching in the virtual and traditional classrooms: a comparative analysis. Internet and Higher Education, 9(1), 23−35.
Russell, J., Elton, L., Swinglehurst, D., & Greenhalgh, T. (2006). Using the online environment in assessment for learning: A case‐study of a web‐based course in primary care. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 465–478. DOI:10.1080/02602930600679209
Scheffler, F. L. & Logan, J. P. (1999). Computer technology in schools: What teachers should know and be able to do. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31, 305- 326.
Smith, G. (2007). How does student performance on formative assessments relate to learning assessed by exams? Journal of College Science Teaching, 36(7), 28–34.
Stewart, B. L., Waight, C. L., Norwood, M. M., & Ezell, S. D. (2004). Formative and summative evaluation of online courses. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 5(2), 101–109.
Topper, A. (1998). Co-constructing practices of teaching with technology: Working collaboratively with TE instructors on technology adoption. Technology and Teacher Education Annual 1998, 74-748.
Walton, G., Barker, J, Hepworth, M. and Stephens, D. (2007). Using online collaborative learning to enhance information literacy delivery in a Level 1 module: an evaluation, Journal of Information Literacy, 1 (1): 13-30: available at http://jil.lboro.ac.uk/ojs/index. php/JIL/article/view/RA-V1-I1-2007-2/3
Wasson, B., Ludvigsen, S., & Hoppe, U. (Eds.). (2003). Designing for change in networked learning environments: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer
Support for Collaborative Learning 2003. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series: Vol 2. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Williams, J. (2006). The place of the closed book, invigilated final examination in a knowledge economy. Educational Media International, 43(2), 107–119
Willis, J., Thempson, A., & Sadera, W. (1999). Research on technology and teacher education: Current status and future directions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47, 29-45.
