Project-Based Learning in English for Specific Purposes (ESP): A Study of Midwifery Students and Lecturers at a Higher Education Institution in Jambi
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aimed to explain and describe the implementation and possible breakthrough of students centered learning approach using PjBL in English for specific purposes among midwifery students. Descriptive qualitative study was used as a method of this study. There were 11 participants consisting midwifery students and English lecturers Higher Education Institution in Jambi. The data were collected through several techniques namely documents, observation and interview. The results indicated that there are three things that must be prepared by the lecturers before implementing PjBL in the classroom; 1) lesson plan, 2) Syntax PjBL, 3) preparing questions that can foster students' critical thinking. The results of the study also reveal that the implementation of PjBL in speaking skills among midwifery students includes several steps in it namely; starting project, developing project, implementing project and evaluation. However, from the findings it was found that, there was 1 lecturer who was less intensive in implementing these stages. The findings in this study also explored and found positive perceptions of midwifery students towards implementing PjBL to enhance students' speaking skills. From the findings, the students explained that PjBL helped them to be more active, enjoy and be able to learn collaboratively. Several participants also explained that there was an increase in progress from the speaking aspect that they felt after the PjBL was implemented. In addition to a positive perspective, this study also managed to find a number of challenges that students felt while participating in learning English speaking class using PjBL. Several possible breakthroughs to the best implement of PjBL for further class were also found in this study. some recommendations and considerations regarding PjBL implementation to enhance students' speaking skills were also given
Article Details
References
Acat, B., & Dönmez, İ. (2009). To compare student centered education and teacher centered education in primary science and technology lesson in terms of learning environments. Procedia Social and Behavioral Science, 1.
Ahmad, A. (2018). Developing barcorious application as teaching media for english young students: Focus on implication. J-SHMIC : Journal of English for Academic, 5(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.25299/jshmic.2018.vol5(2).1631.
Ahmad, A. (2019). Sustainable development in developing country for facing industrial revolution 4.0. ICoSEEH 2019, 233–237.
Ahmad, A., Afrizal, J., & Wulandari, N. (2021). Persepsi mahasiswa terhadap penggunaan kahoot di perguruan tinggi untuk konteks bahasa inggris sebagai bahasa asing. Geram (Gerakan Aktif Menulis) Volume 9, Nomor 1, Juni 2021. Universitas Islam Riau, Pekanbaru, Indonesia. P-ISSN 2338-0446. E-ISSN 2580-376X.
Ahmad, D. J. (2012). English language teaching (ELT) and integration of media technology. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 924.
Ahmadi, M. R. (2018). The use of technology in language learning: a literature review. International Journal of Research in English Education, Guilan University, Guilan, Iran.
Al Rawi, I. (2013). Teaching methodology and its effects on quality learning. Journal of Education and Practice, 4 No. 6.
Alhamid, T., & Anufia, B. (2019). Resume: instrumen pengumpulan data.
Alsaleem, B. A. (2014). The effect of “WhatsApp” electronic dialogue journaling on improving writing vocabulary word choice and voice of EFL undergraduate Saudi Students. Harvard: 21st Century Academic Forum Conference Proceedings. http://www.readwritethink.org/lesson_images/lesson782/Rubric.pdf.
Amirul, H., & Haryono. (1998). Metodologi penelitian pendidikan. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
Anshori, S. (2017). Pemanfaatan teknologi informasi dan komunikasi sebagai media pembelajaran. Civic-Culture: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan PKn dan Sosial Budaya, 88-100.
Attard, A. e. (2010). Student-centered learning toolkit for students staffs, and higher education institution. Education International and The European Student Union.
Balaaco, B. (1996). TESOL technology: New opportunities for learning styles and strategies with computers. TESOL Journal, pp.15-25.
Barrera, Á. P. (2019). Gamification at University level: Analysing the use of kahoot! socrative and quizlet in the english studies degree. Departament de Filologia Espanyola, Moderna i Clàssica. University of the Balearic.
Baxter, S. &. (2001). The application of student-centered learning approaches to clinical education. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders: Supplement, 36, 396-400.
Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(2), 39-43.
Bennett, D., Culp, K. M., Honey, M., Tally, B., & Spielvogel, B. (2000). It all depends: Strategies for designing technologies for educational change. Paper presented at the International Conference on Learning Technology, Philadelphia, PA.
Bielefeldt, T. (2012). Guidance for technology decisions from classroom observation. International Society for Technology in Education.
Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational psychologist, 26(3-4), 369-398.
Borysiuk, A. (2013). Benefits and disadvantages of the use of information technologies in education. National University of Life and Environmental Sciences, Kiev, Ukraine.
Bosher, S. (2013). English for nursing. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, 1961-1966.
Boss, S., & Krauss, J. (2016). Reinventing project-based learning: your field guide to real-world projects in the digital age. International Society for Technology in Education.
Brown, H. D. (1994). Teaching by principle: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice Hall Regeants.
Brown, H. D. (2000). Principle of language learning and teaching (Vol. 4). New York: Longman.
Bruning, R. H., Schraw, G. J., & Ronning, R. R. (1999). Cognitive psychology and instruction. Third Edition. UpperSaddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.
Buck Institute for Education. (2018). Gold Standard PBL: Essential project design elements. Diakses dari https://www.pblworks.org/what-is-pbl/gold-standard-project-design
Budur, A., & Thalha, A. (2019). Resume: instrumen pengumpulan data. Ekonomi Islam. Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri (STAIN), Sorong, 8.
Burns, A. &. (1997).iFocus on speaking. New South Wales, Australia: Macquarie University Sydney.
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1-47.
Carrier, M., Baley, K. M., & Damerow, R. M. (2017). Digital language learning and teaching: research, theory, and practice. New York: Routledge.
Carroll, L. S. (2017). A comprehensive definition of technology from an ethological perspective. Social Sciences, 6(4), 126. doi:10.3390/socsci6040126.
Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D. M., & Goodwin, J. M. (2010). Teaching pronunciation: A course book and reference guide. Cambridge University Press.
Ceron, M. R., Carpigiani, B., Castanheira, M. P., & Silva, A. A. (2016). The perception of teachers about students’ potentialities and difficulties. Future Academy® Cognitive Trading doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.070.
Chaney, A. L. (1998). Teaching Oral Communication in Grades K-8. Allyn and Bacon, Order Processing.
Clet, B. G. (2017). 3 different types of educational technology. https://www.slideshare.net/Bornclet/3-different-types-of-educational-technology.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches 3rd ed. Los Angeles • London • New Delhi • Singapore: SAGE Publications. Inc.
Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language. Cambridge University Press.
Czerkawski, B. C. (2016). Blending formal and informal learning networks for online learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. Volume 17, Number 3.
Czerkawski, B., & Hernandez, J. (2012). Formal, non-formal, informal E- Learning experiences with emerging technologies: A case study of a graduate educational technology program. Pennsylvania, United States: educational technology program.
D. Crystal (2003). English as a global language. Cambridge University Press.
Dianati, S., Nguyen, M., Dao, P., Iwashita, N., & Vasquez, C. (2020). Student perceptions of technological tools for flipped instruction: The case of padlet, Kahoot! and cirrus. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 17(5), 1-16.
Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi, Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia. (2019). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan
Duckworth, E. (2009). Helping students get to where ideas can find them. The New Educator.
Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for Specific Purposes: A Multi-Disciplinary Approach. Cambridge University Press.
Dusek, V. (2006). Philosophy of technology: An introduction. Blackwell's, 31.
Eaton, S. E. (2010). Formal, non-formal and informal learning: What are the differences? Literacy, Languages and Leadership.
Engebrigtsen, O. F. (2006). Culture, networks and social capital: Tamil and Somali immigrants in Norway. Ethnic and Racial Studies.
Eshach, H. (2007). bridging in-school and out-of-school learning: Formal, non-formal, and informal education.
Etfita, F. (2019). Students’ Perspective on the use of edmodo as an assessment tool fauzul. J-SHMIC: Journal of English for Academic, 6(1), 18–25.
Europe, C. o. (2003). Non-formal learning / education. Retrieved from: https://pjp-eu.coe.int/en/web/youth-partnership: https://pjp-eu.coe.int/en/web/youth-partnership/non-formal-learning
Fernandes, F. M. (2012). Students' views of assessment in project-led enginering education: finding from a case study in portugal. Assessment and Evaluation. 163-178.
Field, J. (2014). Pronunciation teaching has to establish in the minds of language learners a set of distinct consonant and vowel sounds. Pronunciation myths: Applying second language research to classroom teaching, 80-106.
Francis, J. (2017). The Effects of Technology on Student Motivation and Engagement in Classroom-Based Learning.All Theses and Dissertations. 121. http://dune.une.edu/theses/121.
Gaille, B. (2018, February 9). Advantages and Disadvantages of Technology in Education. Retrieved from https://brandongaille.com/23-advantages-disadvantages-technology-education/
Godzicki, L., Godzicki, N., Krofel, M., & Michaels, R. (2013). Increasing motivation and engagement in elementary and middle school students through technology-supported learning environments. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov.ezproxy.cu-portland.edu/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED541343
Goh, P. S. C., & Lee, C. D. (2017). Anxiety and self-efficacy in project-based learning: Perceived effects on cognitive outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(1), 203-226
Gutiérrez-Santiuste, E., Gámiz-Sánchez, V.-M., & Gutiérrez-Pérez, J. (2015). MOOC & B-learning: Students’ Barriers and Satisfaction in Formal and Non-formal Learning Environments. Journal of Interactive Online Learning Volume 13, Number 3, Spring 2015, ISSN: 1541-4914.
Habibi, A. (2022). Online Project-Based Learning for ESP: Determinants of Learning Outcomes during Covid-19. Studies in English Language and Education, 985-1001.
Harder, R. &. (2000). AMEE Guide No 20: The good teacher is more than a lecturer the twelve roles of the teacher. Medical Teacher (22 (4)), 334-347.
Hargraves, A. (2003). Teaching in the knowledge society: Education in the age of insecurity. New York.
Harmer, J. (2007). How to Teach English. China: Pearson Education Limited.
Harsyah, A. S. (2019). Student Teachers` Literacy and Challenges in Using Technology for Teaching English Language. http://e-campus.fkip.unja.ac.id/, 1.
Hayirsever. (2016). Student-Centered Learning: How Does it Work in Practice? British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioral Science, 1-15.
Hikmah, D. (2019). Quizlet: A Digital Media for Learning Informatics Terms. IjoEL, VOL. 01 NO. 01, JUNE 2019. Universitas Nurul Jadid Paiton Probolinggo.
Hill, J. R., & Hannafin, M. J. (2001). Teaching and learning in digital environments: The resurgence of resource-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(3), 37-52.
Imad, M. (2015). The perceptions of students and teachers about the benefits of and barriers to technology aided EFL. Journal of Litrature, Languages and Linguistics, 13, 85-99.
Indriati. (2012). Developing student-centered grammar materials for beginners' level indonesia. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 380-401.
İşman, A. (2012). Technology and technique: An educational perspective. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of ducational Technology, 11(2). tojet.net/articles/v11i2/11222.pdf, 207-213.
Isnawati, I. (2017). Students’ views on the use of book and web-based materials for their elt classes: A study on ict-based education in Indonesian context. LSCAC Conference Proceedings The 4th International Conference on Language, Society and Culture in Asian Contexts (2016), Volume 2017.
Jeffrey Froyd, N. S. (2008). Student-centered learning addressing faculty. Course, Curriculum, Labor, 1-11.
Jenkins, J. (2009). English as a lingua franca: Interpretations and attitudes. World Englishes, 28(2), 200-207.
Joesoef, S. (1992). Konsep dasar pendidikan non formal. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2007). The state of cooperative learning in postsecondary and professional settings. Educational Psychology Review, 19(1), 15-29.
Kálecký, R. (2016). Quizlet vs. vocabulary notebook: The impact of different methods of storing and revising vocabulary on students’ progress. Retention and Autonomy. Masaryk University.
Kamai, R. (2011). Toward an Integrated Framework for Language Testing and Intervention, . Journal of Education and Practice.
Kapur, D. R. (2019). Advantages of Technology. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
_Advantages_of_Technology.
Kavlu, A. (2017). Implementation of project-based learning (PBL) in EFL (English as a foreign language) classrooms in Fezalar educational institutions (Iraq). International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 4(2), 67-79.
Kenyon, G. N., & Sen, K. C. (2014). Kenyon, G. N., & Sen, K. C. (2014). The perception process. The Perception of Quality, 41–50. doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-6627-6_5. © Springer-Verlag London 2015.
Kidwell, T. (2012). Implementing a student-centered pedagogy: Doing so in the indonesian teaching-learning context.
Krajcik, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (2006). Project-based Learning. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 317-334). Cambridge University Press.
Kwon, K., Park, J., & Byun, S.-y. (2019). Gender, nonformal learning, and earnings in South Korea. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education. 3.
Larmer, J., Mergendoller, J. R., & Boss, S. (2015). Setting the standard for project based learning: A proven approach to rigorous classroom instruction. ASCD.
Larmer, J., Mergendoller, J. R., & Boss, S. (2015). Setting the Standard for Project
Lea, S. J. (2003). Higher education students' attidues to student centered learning: beyond 'education bulimia'. Studies in Higher Education (28(3)), 321-334.
Lea, S. J. (2003). Higher education students' attidues to student centered learning: beyond 'education bulimia'. Studies in Higher Education (28(3)), 321-334.
Lestari, & Endang., W. D. (2009). Students’ seflt-directed learning readiness, perception toward studentcentered learning and predisposition towards student-centered behaviour. South East Asian Journal of Medical Education.
Luana Sasabone., Y. J. (2021). The implementation of english for specific purposes. Education, Language, and Culture (EDULEC).
M. A. Sukholova. (2020). Formal and non-formal education in ukraine in the context of new socio-cultural challenges. Innovative Solutions in Modern Science.
Manan, A. (2020). The use of information technology into elt at government secondary school level. Asian Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies-AJLLS Vol. 1, Issue 2, December 2020.
Marzano, R. J. (2017). The new art and science of teaching. Solution Tree Press.
McKay, S. L. (2003). Teaching english as an international language: Rethinking goals and approaches. Oxford University Press.
Meleong, L. J. (2010). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakary.
Meng, Q. (2009). Study on the Case Teaching method and the Sustainable Development Education for the Inner Mongol Collages. Journal of Sustainable Development.
Milles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1992). Analisis Data Kualitatif, (Penerjemah: Rohendi Rohidi). Jakarta: UI Press, 16-19.
Milon, S. R., & Iqbal, M. H. (2017). Students’ Perception towards Technology in Learning English as a Foreign Language: A Case Study of Higher Secondary Students of Pabna, Bangladesh. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS) Volume 22, Issue 6, Ver.10 (June. 2017) PP 47-53 e-ISSN: 2279-0837, p-ISSN: 2279-0845.
Mofareh A, A. (2019). The Use of Technology in English Language Teaching. Frontiers in Education Technology Vol. 2, No. 3, 2019 www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/fet ISSN 2576-1846 (Print) ISSN 2576-1854 (Online).
Moleong, L. J. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi Revisi). Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Moreno, G. (2020). Expanding Definition of Technology in Special Education: Impact of Training on the Adoption of iPad Tablets by Special Educators. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education.
Moseley, W. L. (2010). Student and Faculty Perceptions of Technology Usefulness in Community College General Education Courses. Education and Human Sciences, College of (CEHS). Retrieved from Public Access Theses and Dissertations from the College of Education and Human Sciences. 74: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cehsdiss/74/
Nafisa Yeasmin, S. U. (2020). Is non-formal learning a solution to enhance immigrant children’s empowerment in northern Finnish communities? Migration and Development, 4.
Nomass, B. B. (2013). The Impact of Using Technology in Teaching English as a Second Language. English Language and Literature Studies; Vol. 3, No. 1, 112.
P21.org. (n.d.). P21 partnership for 21 century learning. Retrieved August 2021, from http://www.p21.org/our-work/p21-framework
Ralu, J., & Järvelä, S. (2015). Seamless learning despite context. In Wong, L. Hsiang, Milrad, Marcelo, Specht, & Marcus, Seamless Learning in the Age of Mobile Connectivity (pp. 471–484). Singapore: Springer.
Republik Indonesia Nomor 49 Tahun 2019 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi. Jakarta. Prawirohardjo, S., & Suharsa, L. (2015). Buku Acuan Nasional Pendidikan Kebidanan. Jakarta: PT Bina Pustaka Sarwono Prawirohardjo.
Talis, S. N., Akib, E., & Baso, F. A. (2018). The students' perception toward implementing blended learning method in english language teaching (elt) at the 5th semester students of English education department (a descriptive qualitative research). Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan (JKIP), FKIP Unismuh Makassar, Volume 5 No. 1.
Thomas, J. W. (2000). A Review of research on project-based learning. San Rafael, CA: Autodesk Foundation.
Thomas, J. W. (2014). A review of research on project-based learning. http://www.bobpearlman.org/BestPractices/PBL_Research.pdf.
Thomas, J. W. (2020). Project-based learning: a guide for teachers and leaders (2nd ed.). Buck Institute for Education.
Trakhtenberg, K. D. (2012). Modern technology, advantages and disadvantages. Sumy State University, groupЛС – 103 I. M. Terletska – E L Adviser.
Trasierra, M. M. (2018). The use of technology in efl classroms: advantages and disadvantages. Faculty of Education, Translation and Human Sciences. University of Vic - Central University of Catalonia.
Volti, R. (2017). Society and technological change eighth edition. New York: Worth Publishers.
Wajcman, J., & MacKenzie, D. A. (1985). The social shaping of technology: how the refrigerator got its hum. milton keynes: Open University Press.
Weimer, M. (2002). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice